This has specifically made my life extremely vulnerable."Tomorrow while there will be once again a shower of high voltage lies and sugar-coated jumlas from the ramparts of Dalmia Groups Red Fort, our fight for real freedom and dignity, and making the dreams of Bhagat Singh and Babasaheb Ambedkar into a reality will continue with greater resolve.".Khalid, who narrowly escaped a gun attack on Monday when he visited the Constitution Club of India in New Delhi, urged the Prime Minister to assure in speech on Independence Day that critics of government won’t be targeted. I have a suggestion to make - can you please state that you gurantee that there will be no attack on those who criticize your spring nuts govt & its many failures."The fact that two days before Independence Day, in one of the most high security zones of the national capital, an armed assailant could dare to attack me in broad daylight only goes onto show the brazen impunity that some people feel they enjoy under the present regime. There is no evidence, only lies.

The real culprits are those who have provided an atmosphere of complete impunity for assassins and mob lynchers.My statement on the attack on my life. The real culprits are those spokespersons of the ruling party (BJP) and the prime time anchors and TV channels who have spread canards about me, branded me anti-national based on lies and virtually incited a lynch-mob against me.New Delhi: Prime Minister Narendra Modi who asked for suggestions for his Independence Day speech on Tuesday received one from Jawaharlal Nehru University scholar Umar Khalid. I have a suggestion to make - can you please state that you guarantee that there will be no attack on those who criticize your government and its many failures," Khalid posted on Twitter."The real culprits, Khalid said are "those who from their seats of power have been breeding an atmosphere of hatred, of bloodlust and fear.

He added, "What does freedom even mean if the citizens of this country have to be ready to die for their crime of just being vocal against injustice.Khalid said the arrests made in the Gauri Lankesh murder case have exposed the hands of "Hindutva terror outfits".co/Kypw4FCpum— Umar Khalid (@UmarKhalidJNU) August 14, 2018“Modiji, you had asked for suggestions for your I-Day speech.Modi Ji, you had asked for suggestions for your IDay speech."He said even after the police have registered an offence under Section 307 and Arms Act, BJP workers were trying to suggest that the attack never happened or worse that I engineered it on my own?"This hate campaign against me has been going on for last two years. There has been no charge-sheet, only media-trial," Khalid added.In his Facebook post in response to PM Modis solicitation, Khalid, who is fighting a legal battle since he was charged with sedition in 2016, said the attempted gun attack on him on Monday "cant scare us into silence"

But that’s where the other three factors kick in. It’s like they all had an epiphany — at the same time, on the same issue. The political mainstreaming of social media and the like has helped make it a target for a certain, cleansing sort. There’s few easier than the world of online. But then politicians got on the Internet bandwagon and turned social media into a battleground.Now, it’s the State with powerful surveillance tools and the individual citizen under threat.By arrangement with Dawn.But while demand is limited and production unlikely in the extreme, the oversight game has caught up and done what all overseers do when confronted by technological change: stirred panic over what they don’t understand and then latched on to the panic to justify extending their control.Internet use is climbing due to cheaper devices, faster access, more content — and also because of policy tweaks like infrastructure spending and 3G/4G licensing. New powers in the hands of old curmudgeons can have funny effects. More Pakistanis are going online.

And that’s never a good place for freedom to find itself here. There’s no real market for it and, more to the point, no real producers of it in the counter-culture. What’s happening?With so many different strands, some random, several opportunistic, and the mixing of the old with the new, a coherent tale is hard to find. More interesting are the attacks on the alleged transmitter of the latest alleged mischief: the world of online.That’s not really surprising. It could, though, just as easily have resulted in confusion.Thrilled, scared, flummoxed, aghast — if the mainstream political stuff can leave both participant and observer reeling, you can guess the impact that the farther reaches of the Internet could have on the puritanical voyeur. Like the occasional rants against cheap overnight mobile phone calls corrupting the youth and the half-hearted war on porn, the puritans and the corrupt could have continued to coexist in society.It’s happened all over the world, but there’s a local flavour to it here. The most basic difference being how the Internet works.You can’t bypass the State. Rewind to the early days of the private-TV boom. From that perspective, there is a need to reassert the perceived foundations of the State. But it’s not just that the Internet has gone mainstream, it’s that the battles online have gone mainstream.

As is now well known, the fear of being infected by an Indian perspective and the realisation of the nationalist potential of private media triggered a revolution, which was messy at first, but control was eventually mastered.The same impetus to control is again evident, but it sits at the confluence of different factors.Religion under threat is as old as, well, religion.Judges running amok, politicians moralising, the State crusading. There’s at least four of them, one of which is obvious.TV could be unleashed because the means to eventually harness it were obvious too.On to the confluence of the other new factors.Whatever the reasons, the infrastructure of surveillance has grown significantly.The surveillance State has grown. With the Internet you can, or can try to. Online went from something some people were doing to something everyone was talking about. From that perspective, there is a need to find easy targets. The misuse of religion for political and terroristic ends can now, in the softest, most incipient of ways, be called out.There is no evidence, none that has been publicly offered or credibly advanced in private, that there has been a surge in counter-religious narratives online. Flip it around — militants are misguided, but ultimately men of chemical anchors for sale faith who can be shown the right path with patience and through dialogue. There are only so many channels, owners and anchors, and few means of distribution.The need for control quickly became apparent. But zoom out a bit and it’s there all right

Manufacturing is moving back to America but it is labour-less manufacturing. That trend has ended, according to the companies, and they have now begun to downsize anchor bolts for sale and build a smaller, more skilled workforce..Today, China, South America and India have also begun losing such jobs because mechanisation and automation are becoming so efficient that it is cheaper to replace even the low-غير مجاز مي باشدt labour in these countries with technology. Whether it is the Patidars in Gujarat, the Jats in Haryana, the Marathas in Maharashtra, the main demand is of blue-collar work that gives a respectable living wage. He will bring American troops back from wars that cannot be won but he will not be the first President to do that.Economic growth happens when there is an increase in output either through the number of workers or an improvement in efficiency. Merely low غير مجاز مي باشدt is not advantageous and no magic policy, slogan or logo will change that. Henry Ford began the tradition of Americans with such jobs becoming a part of the middle class, with his affordable cars, which even those who assembled them could buy. That was the only skill he was trained in.

This is impossible today and such jobs will never be available on a large enough scale in India or anywhere else in the world for that matter.“Putting America first” is a meaningless slogan, because it assumes previous Presidents have put America second or third, which they have not.The first never happens, because Washington is the capital of a great republic which is over 200 years old. What he meant was, America fought wars abroad in response to domestic demands. That plant had been started in 1919 and it had more than 5,000 employees.The third promise is the most interesting one because we are often told that the real subject of elections in America is jobs and the economy. He had built a nice house with the money he earned through labour and put his children through a good education. It shut down in 2009 because it is cheaper to assemble cars in China and South America because the labour غير مجاز مي باشدts are lower.America’s presidential candidates usually talk of three things — changing Washington, putting America first and putting Americans to work. The real problem of joblessness and democratic politics is happening here in India. To some extent this is also true of China, where the per capita income is about five times more than ours. The problem in India is that there are too many unskilled workers with little education and ability to produce anything. This means those people who work with their hands.In America, there has been plenty of time for those who have been in blue-collar families to receive the benefits of high wage labour.

The world is complex and its economy has evolved in a particular way that cannot be changed by a genius individual.If this is the problem that even white collar and educated Indians face in the cities, what is going to happen of the hundreds of millions in towns and villages? They are in trouble.We must understand the nature of the protests across India on various issues as being born essentially of this unrest.That will, of course, not stop the next President from making the same noises about changing Washington, putting America first and jobs.We must be wary of the populist leader who promises simplistic solutions. Mr Trump’s vote base is white men with blue collar jobs. They will no longer hire people in large numbers.This was an unusual piece of information because for two decades the software firms of India have been hiring aggressively. Henry Kissinger, the secretary of state to Richard Nixon, said that all foreign policy was actually domestic policy. It is the city which controls the largest economy of any nation in the world and controls the most powerful military of any nation in the world.This is why, ultimately, the promise Mr Trump makes of putting Americans to work will be an empty one. And it is happening now, right before us. It is not a city that is awaiting a saviour and any drastic change, even if possible, would likely be a change for the worse. It was revealed a few days ago that Infosys had fired 8,000 workers because of automation. And so it is unlikely Donald Trump will be able to change much in that sense either. This is true as much in India as it is in America.I lived as a student in Janesville, Wisconsin 30 years ago and one of the families I stayed with, the Johnsons, belonged to a man who had been assembling wheels on cars for decades